January 25, 2003
-
I'm still achy a bit & there's still alot of pressure in my right ear, as well as not having much endurance, but that will pass. Being ill like this, without knowing if it started with a virus or some bacterial agent that can be passed on to others, I continue to limit my exposure to others. Also, with my immune system compromised for now, I don't want to be exposed to another possible illness that could put me in a hospital next! It is Friday, with my usual routine of going to the VFW canteen. I have not since the first Friday of the new year!
Some of you may be wondering why I have not commented much lately. Besides seeming to always being behind by 3 days at least in reading my subscriptions emails, I now no longer get them! I am one of the ones that john recently commented isn't getting them, much to their chagrin. Little does he realize that my feedback emails were always sporadic in coming & stopped completely for all of my Xanga accounts several months ago.
I have been doing research all day (almost) on what may be causing this on my end. I have learned that my primary email account (my ISP, FlexNet, who are as cheap & a thousand times more reliable than Juno or NetZero!) has recently added anti-spam software onto their email servers. Unfortunately, they don't retain the blocked emails for the customer to scan through to find out if it's truly spam, or asubscription that they HAVE subscribed to! They don't have the capability of 'white-listing' the address of the sender.
From talking to a few others, with different email servers, I have learned they are not getting some of their important email either. In one case, I sent an email to someone, through my Incredimail email manager program from that ISP email address & it immediately bounced back to me. This happened consistently, resulting in an argument with the recipient, who would not listen to what I said about making my address ok to receive. He finally found my emails on the server in the spam folder (or however they have it set up).
He still didn't 'white-list' my address for a few days, until he researched more about the spam-blocker at his ISP. Even then, he sent me a copy of the ISP's spam FAQ, with the info on how to remedy it, but still didn't 'white-list' me until I replied to it, remarking on the capability of 'white-listing' individuals' addresses. I had previously stated (but his point of view stayed another direction) that most spam filters have the capability of changing a previously spam-blocked email address to acceptable. I hate it when someone has their mind set on one thought, so don't hear what they are being told (at least not what is actually being said, instead hearing what they are focused on)! Did that make sense to you?
It did to me, the best I can explain it at this time.
One thing I've been avoiding in my blog postings in my stance on what is going on in the world, with the US at the forefront. I have done this in deference to a few of my since-distanced friends who did read my blogs at one time. My feelings in these matters, & the facts that led me to those conclusions, have pushed those friends away, at a time when I've needed them the most, because of so many health issues. In essence, they're still not there for me, not in much respect anyway, since I no longer can talk or chat with them openly, having to watch every word I type (I'm no longer in voice-contact with the one who had been my best friend for about 10 years IRL), even though the events are proving what I stated then as correct. Attitudes many had? 'I can't do anything about it, so I don't want to hear it' & 'You're WRONG!!!'
Hey, Dread, are you ready to see the truth NOW, especially after saying that oil has nothing to do with the Shrubs' actions, then (early 90s), or now? After all, daddy has bailed jr out at least 3 times in the oil industry, which is a matter of public record, so should be available through your beloved Wall Street Journal archives (look back in the early to mid 80s). Why is Jr Shrub not so concerned about North Korea, who DOES have nukes & has suggested that they may sell to Iraq & is entirely anti-US? Could it be that North Korea doesn't have any viable commodities that the Shrubs want? Just what is their economy based upon anyway? I thought I knew, but that company is in South Korea (Hyundai).
This just touches upon what I'd like to write about in a future blog. When I do, it will have a warning heading (so those of you who are dead-set against participating in the decisions our Administration is making can skip over). It will also have links to information resources that help back my stance. I've had it with the warmongering of the political elite! I'm tired of hearing about our friends & loved ones getting killed, or worse, suffering permanent body & emotional damage, serving as pawns to the rich elite in a global chess game!
Comments (9)
*Dread Stands upon the quarterdeck with eyebrow raised*
Pi writes, “Hey, Dread, are you ready to see the truth NOW, especially after saying that oil has nothing to do with the Shrubs' actions, then (early 90s), or now? After all, daddy has bailed jr out at least 3 times in the oil industry, which is a matter of public record, so should be available through your beloved Wall Street Journal archives (look back in the early to mid 80s).”
Dread responds, “Ever so glad to see that you have been doing your homework. But quite frankly after Enron and the serious lack of ethical accounting practice in US business (that I have often written about here on the Scrolls) how can you STILL look at “matter of public record” and NOT question their validity. Word to the wise, believe very little of what you see in accounting / business documents. (Big business is not called smoke and mirrors for nothing…) OK, I will put this in simplest terms. The Bush’s are invested in US oil. If oil went south in every other country it would only make them richer… get it? Can you see the light? Let me say that again in another way. If all foreign oil stopped the Bush family income statement would skyrocket.
Allow me to further state the oil does in fact have a place within this new war. You seem to believe that the entire effort is based upon the commodity. I believe that oil plays a very small role in this conflict.
Pi writes, “Why is Jr Shrub not so concerned about North Korea, who DOES have nukes & has suggested that they may sell to Iraq & is entirely anti-US?”
Dread Responds, “Damn glad that you have x-ray vision all the way from Hawaii to know that North Korea has nuclear missile capabilities. Considering both the North Korean government and the UN state that this is not the case you base your assumptions on what may I ask? Perhaps you should send your resume to the United Nations for the job position of ‘Weapons Inspector’. I bet they will no doubt be impressed by your abilities.
Now, to answer your question; North Korea, in your own words entered the “elite in a global chess game.” Seeing an opening to squeeze MONEY out of both the United Nations and the United States they played a very dangerous political game of exposing their Queen. (read: nuclear program) Have you noted that talks between North and South Korea have never been better? Have you noted that Japan, the country that has the most to loose by its close proximity has said very little about the ‘supposed program’? Do yourself a very small favor and look GLOBALLY when attempting to ascertain exactly why the Government of the United States of America has not formally addressed this situation.
Pi writes, “Could it be that North Korea doesn't have any viable commodities that the Shrubs want? Just what is their economy based upon anyway? I thought I knew, but that company is in South Korea (Hyundai).”
Dread Responds, “ The C.I.A. World Fact Book states the economic overview as, “North Korea, one of the world's most centrally planned and isolated economies, faces desperate economic conditions. Industrial capital stock is nearly beyond repair as a result of years of underinvestment and spare parts shortages. Industrial and power output have declined in parallel. Despite a good harvest in 2001, the nation faces its eighth year of food shortages because of a lack of arable land; collective farming; weather-related problems, including major drought in 2000; and chronic shortages of fertilizer and fuel. Massive international food aid deliveries have allowed the regime to escape mass starvation since 1995-96, but the population remains vulnerable to prolonged malnutrition and deteriorating living conditions. Large-scale military spending eats up resources needed for investment and civilian consumption. In 2001, the regime placed emphasis on earning hard currency, developing information technology, addressing power shortages, and attracting foreign aid, but in no way at the expense of relinquishing central control over key national assets or undergoing widespread market-oriented reforms.”
Also note that the GDP, (real growth rate) of the country stands at –3% as of estimated 2001. This is the number that gives you the heads up on the economic direction of the country. Let us look at a few others for the sake of comparison. South Korea ; 3.3%. United States; .03%. Vietnam; 4.7%. In looking at these numbers you can make the argument that North Korea has absolutely nothing in the way of economic ventures that anyone wants. By your statement I would believe that you think that the Bush family has a personal stake in the economy of North Korea. I do not believe that this is the case. I can see no logic behind your query of “Could it be that North Korea doesn't have any viable commodities that the Shrubs want?”
Perhaps the next time you visit the VFW you might ask around and attempt to bring yourself up to speed on a war we here on the main land call, “The Korean War.” Once you get a few first hand accounts begin the long laborious task of educating yourself on the relationship between the United States of America and a country that is smaller than the state of Mississippi who boasts a government of “authoritarian socialist; one-man dictatorship”.
Pi writes, “I've had it with the warmongering of the political elite! I'm tired of hearing about our friends & loved ones getting killed, or worse, suffering permanent body & emotional damage, serving as pawns to the rich elite in a global chess game!”
Dread responds, “I can feel your anxiety over going to war yet again. War, for all intents and purposes is hell. Been there and done that so I speak form the platform of experience and not just a pondering. I am not, by any stretch of the imagination, politically elite but I am in fact in this case a War Pig.
Why you ask? I am a war pig in this case because I fought in what most historians and military analyses consider the first true terrorist war. I stood with the UN peacekeeping force in Beirut Lebanon when a terrorist drove a bus into the US embassy and detonated the largest conventional explosion to date that killed over 350 US Marines and Sailors. In a split second they were gone. Just as on Sept 11th.
There is only one language that terrorists understand, and that is the idiom of force. I have spent years following global terrorism and cell growth. While the world turned a blind eye to the obvious I have watched as innocent people have died for no good reason. It is time that the madness ends. It is time that those who wish to wage war on the innocent and the civilians know War. It is time that those who stand in the shadow fear the dark. I am a War Pig and I am proud to say that I curse every terrorist and every individual that has ever had any dealings with AL Qaeda or the like. I wish upon them the very insanity that they bring to the innocent.
It is only through War that we all shall know Peace.
Interesting remarks, Dread! *Thinking, thinking*
I do find a problem with your statement: "There is only one language that terrorists understand, and that is the idiom of force. I have spent years following global terrorism and cell growth. While the world turned a blind eye to the obvious I have watched as innocent people have died for no good reason. It is time that the madness ends. It is time that those who wish to wage war on the innocent and the civilians know War."
I do not find anything here that does not disqualify the US under the definition of terrorists. After all, the US has killed as many, if not more, civilians in our ordered military strikes, in ANY conflict we have participated in.
Should Iraq instate a 'No-Fly Zone' over a US Mainland corridor, would we not fire at any of their planes over OUR homeland? Yet, WE imposed a 'No-Fly Zone' right through THEIR homeland. Is it any wonder that they would shoot at planes that aren't their allies, flying over the middle of THEIR country? What right does that give us to attack their ground structures, yet we have been doing that more than once since the acceptance of UN Security Counsel's 1441 (the language of which is ambiguous at best).
You assumed that I have not already spoken to Korean War Veterans. Right now, one of my subdivision neighbors, fellow DAV member & recipient of the US Order of the Purple Heart for wounds received in the Korean War, is dying from laryngeal cancer.
Also, the VFW's new bartender is a post-Korean War Veteran, who has filled me in on some interesting tidbits. For example, the conflict in the DMZ remains active to this day. There are still our troops standing watch in that region, & falling to attacks from the North.
One of my jobs in the Navy was to install & maintain phone & teletype connections between the Mid-Pacific & Asia. Every year, we were required to establish additional, temporary connections for Team Spirit (one year, I got a Letter of Appreciation from The White House for my involvement).
The daughter of a woman who was providing me with transportation (for shopping during my cancer treatments & other health issues when I had no running wheels) got shipped out to Korea. She let her mom know that there were still incidents of attacks against our troops in the region, although she was not permitted to give details.
Were we NOT in those regions, our military members would not become victims of these assaults, geared mostly toward these countries' own inner conflicts that WE step into. Call it Social Darwinism. What right do we have to impose our values & beliefs upon other nations, who have been in existence a hell of a lot longer than our own? We are babies, compared to them. But then, isn't it true that children think they know better than the adults what is right for everyone?
I've tried a million email addresses cos I am in business and give out my address on the net and some asshole eventually sticks it on a list. The best of all the sites I have found is fastmail.fm. I never seem to get any spam but have never lost an email either. It works through Outlook Express or on the net.
Additionally, why I brought North Korea into this discussion is to point out that Jr doesn't seem to take them as a serious threat, as he does specifically Iraq. Iraq has control of a fair amount of the world's oil resources, a personal financial interest to him. If control was switched into his hands, he would then be able to set crude pricing, which the Middle East has kept reasonably low, forcing our oil companies to retain pricing that reduces the profits. North Korea has nothing of value to him, so in his financial portfolio, nothing would be gained by including them in his 'anti-terrorism' campaign.
The statistics you posted above mentioned specifically South Korea, not North Korea. South Korea has one of the largest ship-building industries in the world (hmmm... does our Navy get its new ships from them?). This is their largest economic resource. We already have some influence there, don't we, since we managed to help empower their current president.
I do not begrudge your first hand experience in Beruit. I just believe our troops didn't need to be there in the first place. It isn't our soil. We have too many problems here at home, to waste our manpower, money & resources on other countries, who, in the end, turn their backs on us. Let us worry about our own first.
Hun, Back up and reread. All stats are about North Korea and NOT South Korea.
All of the US Navy ships are built predominantly by Newport News shipbuilding. All US ships are built at home for security reasons. (You were in the US Navy and do not know this?)
To suggest that the US Government practices terrorism is simply ludicrous. There is one hell of allot of difference from collateral damage to an act of terrorism. You just lost any credibility in your stance.
Are you skipping your meds again? Perhaps the dosage is off…
So we use a different term... 'collateral damage.' The same effect is the result; thousands of innocent civilians are dead (as in the Hiroshima & Nagasaki A-bomb drops by our Air Force in WWII), to cause the recipients major devastation, bringing them to their knees.
Are you unaware of the civilian causalties in Vietnam? Yes, they did use women & children to bring armed hand grenades into our troops' vicinity. As the saying goes, 'All's fair in love & war.' So, how about not having war? Love is a whole lot better, in most people's opinion.
Deception is our middle name. There is nothing that others have done that we haven't, in our own fashion, somewhere within our short history.
We are famous for creating 'politically correct' phrases, either to justify a position or action that is considered unmoral or not of good regard (hence the expressions & lables 'friendly fire' & 'sanitation engineer'). Those sound alot better than 'killed by their own military' or 'garbage collector,' don't they? I look past the 'politically correct' terminology for their true meaning.
I do not support making something bad 'appear good.' It is like the way the legal professions word proposals for new legislations, purposely to trick voters or catch them off-guard. This has resulted in an overabundance of laws on the books that benefit the very few... the rich, at the expense of at least 90% of our population (look at the auto insurance legislation & its outcomes).
As Native Americans said well over 200 years ago, 'White man speak with forked-tongue.' We have just perfected that capability over time. Alduous Huxley had great insight in his writings. Too bad we, as a general rule, haven't yet learned from our mistakes. Those who understand lack the clout to achieve true peace.
One thing I started to to write in my first comment, which was lost when my computer locked up... (I was tracking down some information) at the time & have finally found some of the proof I was hunting for:
I found mention of the recent medal authorized by Jr for Veterans of Korean area defense service after the Armistice was signed in 1954. As Tom (that previously mentioned bartender) just told me, there have been over 4400 incursions within the DMZ since 1954, including over 1000 US troops killed.
He is a major player in our region for recognition of those victims, & those who have managed to survive. He, himself, deals with Agent Orange exposure effects, having previously shown me (& a few other patrons at the time) his recurring cancerous lesions on his back. He also let me know that the soldiers were led to believe that these defoliant agents were NOT hazardous to humans. Some of the soldiers involved with the chemicals actually sprayed the crap on themselves & each other, in play!!!
Stupid action, yes, but they believed what they were told, so felt comfortable with what they were handling, just as those troops staged at varying distances from Ground Zero A-Bomb testing in the 40s & 50s. As I said before, we non-elite become nothing more than 'pawns in a game of chess,' in which the spoils go to the victorious elite few (rich).
As for your remark that I need to back up when I said your posted stats were abbout South, not North Korea: "Also note that the GDP, (real growth rate) of the country stands at –3% as of estimated 2001. This is the number that gives you the heads up on the economic direction of the country. Let us look at a few others for the sake of comparison. South Korea ; 3.3%. United States; .03%. Vietnam; 4.7%"
I believe you are the 'hun' who needs to back up!
Please note that the remarks I have made in my comments on my blog are directed at Dread, even though I have inadvertently neglected to mention his name when posting them... Sorry!
Comments are closed.